Unworthy rebels, redeemed by the King of Kings and made servants fit for His use.

Category: Uncategorized (Page 21 of 39)

The Laws of Men and Societal Change

Proponents of Critical Race Theory, those who believe racism is systemic to our culture, often argue that the solution to racism is the creation of new laws. That, by giving the power to government to enact legislation that requires people to divest themselves of “white privilege” and to elevate persons of color will bring about the necessary societal change to defeat racism. As many others have pointed out, this is little more than social Marxism. That the “haves” (those with white privilege) must give up their positions to the “have nots” (disenfranchised persons of color) so that society will be equitable. That there cannot be equality without equity.

Unfortunately, there are great many Christians who have fallen prey to this line of thinking. In an effort to demonstrate their care and concerns for perceived victims of racism, many Christians have been lulled into the idea that systemic injustices exist because disparities exist. They unquestioningly believe people’s “lived experiences” and see them as evidence of ongoing racism in our culture. Because they see God as a God of justice, they have bought into the lie that social justice (an unbiblical concept) is actually an outworking of the gospel to bring about true justice into the culture. Thus, many have supported the idea that increased legislation is actually doing gospel work in our nation so that we are “loving our neighbors.”

This, however well-intentioned, is entirely misguided. The establishing of new laws cannot bring about societal change as so many have argued. We know this because we can see from Scripture that God’s own laws, which are righteous and perfect, do not bring about a utopia on this world. In fact, as Paul argues in Romans 7:7-25 that, while God’s law is perfect, man is utterly incapable of keeping it. The law exposes a very real problem in the heart of man, sin. Mankind is born in sin, we have a corrupted nature that rebels at the very mention of the law.

Paul demonstrates this when he writes, “Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet.’ But sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. For apart from the law, sin lies dead.” (Romans 7:7b–8). Our sinful nature immediately reacts to any law placed upon it with rebellion. You see this when we read a sign that says “Wet paint, don’t touch,” or “Keep off the grass.” Our very first instinct is to do that which we have been told not to do. The law exposes that our hearts are rebel factories, simply looking for a reason to act in contradiction to anything we’ve been told to not do.

Paul rightly points out that the law is not responsible for making us sin. We break the law because our default state is to sin. God’s law is perfect and the fact we even think about wanting to break it proves that the law is good. If our hearts are sinful by nature, then we show that God’s law is good because our hearts do not want to obey it. Therefore, law cannot and does not change our default desires. Law only exposes that we will rebel when given a chance to do so.

Naturally, it is right to understand there is a distinction between the law of man and the law of God. His laws are always right and true. He cannot make law that is not perfect because His laws are a reflection of His glorious nature. Man’s laws can either be good, insomuch as they reflect the nature of God, or they can be bad, in that they contradict His nature and commandments. For example, laws that forbid lying, theft, and murder reflect the nature of a perfect God who does not lie and provides what is needed for His people whom He created in His image and likeness. Yet, laws such as allow for abortion, the wanton murder of a life in the womb of a mother, is incompatible with a God who has commanded we shall not murder. We recognize then that man’s laws are not always right and good. Yet, whether a law is good or bad, man by nature will always desire to rebel against any command placed upon him.

When it comes to the matter of laws regarding social justice, we must come to realize such laws do not have a Scriptural basis. Social justice argues that true equality only occurs when all persons have equity of outcome. It is argued that any disparity between people groups is proof of oppression. The only way to overcome and end the oppression is to tear down the existing unjust system and rebuild a new society based upon equitable distribution of wealth, position, and power. Nowhere in Scripture can anyone find such an argument. In fact, Scripture speaks of private property ownership. It also allows for the possession of wealth, yet not the misuse of it to deprive others of the wages they have earned.

Christ’s teachings with regard to wealth and power were not that the mere possession of it was sinful, but the desire to have it over and above the desire to love and obey God was. Those with power were not to lord it over others, but to use their position to serve. Those with wealth were to be willing to provide for the needs of others, not out of compulsion, but out of a sincere desire to love God and love others. Christ never taught for the tearing down of entire systems of wealth and power, rather that those who had such never place them before the love and service to God. If having such caused one to be idolatrous, then we were to give it all up for the sake of Christ.

Christians ought to recognize that bringing in laws which declare possession of power, wealth, or position are inherently evil have no basis in Scripture. Furthermore, God does not command that we not only believe such persons are oppressors by nature and that the existence of disparities now or throughout history prove racism. God holds each person accountable for the thoughts, words, and deeds of his own heart. He does not hold the son guilty for the sins (real or perceived) of the father. He does not declare that men and women are guilty of oppressing others simply because an unbiblical philosophical claims it to be so. And He gives no biblical command to take from one group and give to others to make right perceived unjust disparities. Yet, proponents of Critical Race Theory are arguing for such laws and far too many Christians are towing that line.

We must recognize that any law placed upon men will immediately result in a desire to rebel against said law. While, perhaps, it may act as a curb against certain behaviors, it cannot change the heart’s desire. Many a neighbor has likely been spared a punch to the face because someone feared arrest for Battery. Yet, the existence of Battery laws does not change the hate a man will feel in his heart toward his neighbor. The law may cause him to obey out of fear of legal action, but it will not keep him from desiring to harm another.

Likewise, we must also understand that unjust laws, such as those that declare a man guilty of a crime he never committed and take from him to give to another, will give rise to bitterness and anger. Being told that you are guilty for the perceived sins of generations past and that only by bowing to the new order of things can you make restitution, will cause many persons to feel they are being treated unjustly. In fact, the new order of things actually tells a man that even feeling angry over being charged with such a “sin” is proof of his guilt. How then can we expect that such laws will bring about a change of heart and mind? Such laws may bring about an outward appearance of equity of outcome, but there will be no heart change of any kind. Yes, there will be a redistribution of wealth and position, but rest assured, those who have been charged as guilty will chafe under unjust chains which they have been placed under. Resentment and bitterness will grow. Love for one’s neighbor will be quashed as the heart, already a factory of sin, will find further reason to hate those who have placed him under perceived bondage.

The human heart rebel’s against good and just laws. Such laws are good for us. They hold us accountable when we disobey God’s righteous commands and harm others. Yet, as Paul argues in Romans 7, those laws only expose that we cannot be made righteous by them. When man creates unjust laws and demands obeisance, men will double in their desire to disobey. Unjust laws cause us to become bitter and angry, which the sinful heart will only magnify. In either matter, it is the issue of the heart that must be addressed. And laws, neither good or bad, can change the human heart.

This is where Christians and the church need to shine. We already know that laws cannot make a man righteous. Only the gospel can accomplish this. Only God can send His Spirit into the heart of man, regenerate him, and make him a new creation. Only Jesus can take the wrath man deserves and, in turn, clothe him in righteousness. Only then does man desire in his heart to love his neighbor as himself. Only then does man desire to obey the just and good laws of God. Only then is he willing to sacrifice of his own time, wealth, position, or power to share and care for others. Law of itself cannot ever accomplish this, only the gospel can. And such a changed heart will distinguish between just and unjust laws. It will greatly desire to obey all that God has commanded. But, often it will rightly recognize and reject those laws that are manmade, which are in contradiction to the Word. This should be encouraged to grow and mature, not silenced and told to obey because social justice demands it.

Churches that seek to create societal change through unjust laws betray the gospel message. They reject the notion that law cannot change the heart. They seek to impose godless ideologies on people and claim this is the outworking of the gospel. Nothing could be further from the truth. What they believe is a good work is actually seeking to add more law over and above the commands of God. They claim this will accomplish change and establish justice in culture, but in fact it will create further rebellion in the hearts of men. And what little cleaning of the outside of the cup they may accomplish, they will only stir up further poison and sin on the inside.

Christians, we must first seek the kingdom of God. We do this through the preaching of the gospel. We identify what is truly sin and call people to repentance and faith. We call people to love Christ and love their neighbor. We command those in the church to live according to the commandments of God and reject godless ideologies which seek to rewrite and corrupt Scripture. We do this, not because we seek societal change, rather we seek to bring rebel sinners into communion with God. We do this to save them from His just wrath and for His glory. Then, we trust in God to work through the Spirit in the hearts of men to love and treat their neighbors as they are commanded to. And, should they fail to do so, should they sin against their brethren, we come alongside and lovingly rebuke or correct them.

The church is not a societal change agent. The church is the bride of Christ. Time for us to get back to being what He has called us to be.

Thought For The Day: Words Matter – Our Identity

We have to get this right. There is a difference between temptation which we struggle against and identifying ourselves with said temptation as though it is part of our makeup.

If I said I was a “lust-attracted Christian” or a “theft-attracted Christian” we easily see the problem. It makes zero sense to identify ourselves by our temptation to sin. So calling one’s self as a “same-sex attracted Christian” makes it possible for someone to hold onto the lie that we are identified by our sexuality.

A Christian can struggle against sexual temptation & still be a Christian. We all struggle against sin daily. But giving sin identity and merging that with the name of Christian is a slap in the face to what Christ did in and for us.

We are no longer the old man. We are new creations. We are no longer slaves to sin. We are slaves to righteousness. We are identified as followers of Christ, serving a new Lord and Master.

Thus, to wed sinful desires to the name of our new Master is an utter contradiction in terms. It is nothing more than an attempt to appease those of the tolerance crowd who have complained the church has been too mean to homosexuals.

So, the wedding of these mutually exclusive terms is an attempt to soften the blow by saying being a homosexual in identity is OK, but acting on it is not. Folks, this needs to stop.

No, we cannot add offense to the gospel for the sake of being offensive. But, the gospel message is in fact offensive to a sin-hardened world. It tells us to reject the sins of our heart and turn to Christ. He is our Lord, He is our Master, and He is our identity.

Let us forsake the merging of the profane with the holy that we might somehow seem more “loving.” Rather, let us in love call out sin and call people to repentance without equivocation.

VOR Rewind – How Do You Develop a Biblical Worldview?

This week, we return to last year when Chris and Rich discussed the need for Christians to develop and apply a biblical worldview in their lives.

Show Links:

Focus on the Family – What’s a Christian Worldview?

CARM – What Are Some Christian Worldview Essentials?

CARM – What Are Some Elements of a Christian Worldview?

Voice of Reason Radio on Christian Podcast Community

Big Evangelicals Redefine the Biblical Church

This week, Chris and Rich discuss recent statements by well-known evangelicals such as J. D. Greear and Beth Moore which indicate a move to redefine what makes a church biblical.

Show Link:

Dwight McKissic Article

Thought for the Day: A Change is in the Air

It is my firm belief there is a concerted effort in evangelicalism to change the definition of what is a biblical Christian.

Voted for Trump? Believe in Constitutional conservatism? You’re an unloving person, not a Christian, and probably a Nazi.

Believe the Bible is true in what is says about roles for men and women? That secular-humanist theoretical systems should not supplant Scripture? That God defines justice and not anti-Christian ivory tower elitists? You’re not a Christian, you are a hate-spewing bigotted racist.

Don’t believe the church should be dictated to by the government? Believe that meeting together to worship is a command of God to be obeyed? That a virus shouldn’t shut down the local assembly? You are an unloving person who hates your neighbor and who sets a horrendous example for those around you.

This will be the battle in the days, weeks, and even years to come. What is the definition of a biblical Christian? Who decides that? Scripture alone, or those who contort its words in order to advance their agenda? The answer should be simple, but the message is being clouded by redefining what biblical principles such as love and justice mean.

It’s past time for Christians to become serious about studying God’s Word diligently, to understand its clear meaning, to apply it in their lives, and to reject worldly ideologies being imported into the church.

The Liberal Insurrection in America

This week, Rich and Chris talk about the decades-long war that has been waged against the American way of life, the future it may hold, and what the Christian needs to do in light of it all.

Thought For The Day: Christian Nationalism

Christian Nationalism has been the new scare term used within elite evangelical circles these days. Primarily it has been used to describe Christians who supported President Trump in the 2020 election cycle. It paints a picture of Christians who ascribe to an extreme view of right-wing political conservatism.

The problem with this term is, like many scare terms, it is utterly flexible and lacking in any concrete definition. Nationalism, the idea that one loves and desires to promote one’s own nation over others, can have both good and bad impacts.

It can be a good thing to want one’s nation defended from foreign aggressors, to have the rule of law upheld, and to see freedom promoted and defended for its citizens. These desires can promote the prosperity and general welfare of the people of a nation while not neglecting the need to remain a face in the world at large, aiding other nations as need and ability arises.

However, nationalism can be a negative as well. Adolf Hitler demonstrated in the 1930s how one can manipulate the love of one’s nation to a fever pitch. That love of nation didn’t just simply mean promotion of the general welfare of the nation first, but a superiority to the point that a nation should dominate over others. So nationalism can indeed have a negative ditch into which a people may fall.

Evangelical elites like to use the most negative connotation of nationalism when throwing around the term “Christian Nationalism.” It seems they wish to paint Christians who love America and desire to protect its freedoms as those who uphold dangerous right-wing views (and yes, it is possible to take right-wings views to dangerous extremes, another point for another time).

This centered quite heavily during the 2020 election when evangelical elites wanted to be seen as opposing Donald Trump’s efforts at reelection. Media and political opponents have tried to create an image of Trump for four years as a racist, misogynist, and dangerous dictator. Evangelical elites were more than happy to aid in that cause in order to maintain credibility with popular culture.

Therefore, it was necessary to describe any Christian who intended to vote for Trump as being a “Christian Nationalist.” If Donald Trump was Hitler reincarnated, a wannabe dictator who was using conservatives to establish an American “Reich,” then any Christian who voted for him was a nationalist who needed to be exposed for extremist right-wing views.

Sadly, what many of these elites purposely ignored was that many Christians looked at the policies of Trump and the four years of his administration where he fought for religious protections, promoting freedom, and sought to protect the lives of the unborn. Christians were not ignorant of Trump’s serious character flaws, nor were they unaware of his arrogant and troublesome statements on Twitter.

Yet, when his policies were compared with the promises of unchecked Marxism made by the Biden campaign, many Christians knew that American freedom and exceptionalism were on the line. Whether they were die-hard supporters or people who reluctantly chose a lesser evil, Christians sought to re-elect a man who they felt would do the most to maintain the unique experiment that is the United States.

The term “Christian Nationalism” is a distraction. It is meant to invoke fear in the Christian electorate. That, if you voted for a man such as Trump, you may as well admit to being a modern day Nazi supporting a new Hitler. It is meant to cause fear and doubt. That Christians shouldn’t care about freedom or prosperity in a nation that still has racism, sexism, etc (as defined by Critical Theory, another anti-biblical compromise embraced by the elites). That if you do care more about freedom than supposed systemic-injustices, then you really aren’t a Christian at all.

Christians ought not fear demonization by evangelical elites. Those who seek to cozy up to the whims of culture in order to receive a crust of bread have long since abandoned any true submission to biblical fidelity. As such, their efforts to scare Christians into towing their line of leftist leaning reasoning should be ignored without a second thought.

This does not free us from being biblical when it comes to how we should cast our votes, however. There is a danger in taking nationalism too far. We should look to the proposals and policies of any candidate and seek to support only those whose promises most closely align with Scripture. Our desire to protect our freedoms should never allow us to choose a lesser evil that would put us in contradiction with Scripture.

So, Christian, don’t let the elitists in Big Eva frighten you. They have no power in your life. Furthermore, they need to repent of their own lack of biblical fidelity. You focus on being faithful to God, which often times means using your vote to promote freedom and prosperity in the unique nation God has placed you.

Thought for the Day: The Language of Extremism – Evangelicalism at a Crossroads.

Given the current state of affairs in America, it is evident there will be even greater pressure brought upon the church to conform to the world’s standards. In light of the incident at the Capitol, the language of “extremism” will be applied to anything remotely appearing to be connected to Trump and conservatism.

Overwhelmingly, Christians are associated with the GOP and, as such, pressure will be brought to bear against churches to disavow any connection to Trump and his supporters. Be assured, simply condemning the actions on January 6, 2021, will not be enough. Claiming President Trump was responsible will not be enough.

Any attitude, dogma, belief, or opinion espoused by a Christian that can be connected to that day (no matter how ridiculously stretched out of shape) will be expected to be rejected. Not only rejected, but the church must espouse an opposing view, affirming the worldly definition of tolerance and love. Any belief that affirms the existence of sin, individual responsibility, objective truth/morality, and judgment from God will be declared divisive and dangerous.

This presents a clear crossroads for the American church. We have seen many evangelicals calling for more of a compromise with worldly ideals (i.e. seeker-friendly marketing, adoption of social justice ideals, softening of the gospel) in order to maintain some kind of influence in the culture.

Now, with the new order of things, such compromises will be expected to be greater by the culture at large. The professing church can either continue down the path of shifting goalposts, seeking the crumbs of approval of culture or it can stand firmly on the Word of God knowing it will cost us deeply.

Chasing the culture has always, ALWAYS, compromised the sufficiency of the Word of God and led people astray. Standing firm on God’s Word has always grown the church as it depends solely upon Christ alone.

The church can no longer be concerned with how the world views or what the world wants of us. We must stand firmly and proclaim directly to the world they need to submit to God’s Word, His gospel. The Scriptures speak to everything we need for life and godliness. Anything that detracts from this must be rejected. Wordly ideologies cannot “help” or “clarify” Scripture. In fact, they can only distract from or attempt to supplant God’s Word.

Using the world’s methods will leaving us chasing ghosts we can never catch. We will mislead our people and dishonor the Savior we claim to serve.
We must stand firmly on the Word of God, boldly proclaiming the truth without fear. This will cost us, it will bring the world against us, but we will honor God and His Word. And He will use it for His glory. Stand firm and preach the gospel.

How Then Shall We Live in 2021?

We made it!  It is the first episode of 2021! This week, Chris and Rich look back on 2020 and discuss how the challenges of the previous year can prepare us for the uncertainty of the new year. May our eyes ever be fixed on Jesus Christ in 2021.

Without Easter There Is No Christmas

This week, Chris and Rich discuss the incarnation of Christ, His sinless life, His sacrificial death, and the all-important topic of the resurrection. Christmas is upon us but it is meaningless without the resurrection, as there would be no forgiveness for sins.

Christian Podcast Community

« Older posts Newer posts »