This week, Chris and Rich discuss the recent capitulation by the Bethany Christian Services organization to offer adoption and child services to LGBTQ homes. How should Christians understand and respond to this development?
Show Links:
Unworthy rebels, redeemed by the King of Kings and made servants fit for His use.
This week, Chris and Rich discuss the recent capitulation by the Bethany Christian Services organization to offer adoption and child services to LGBTQ homes. How should Christians understand and respond to this development?
Show Links:
One of the more interesting aspects of leftist/progressivist “Christianity” is the emphasis that true Christians love people no matter what. If a person is LGBT+ for example, then true Christianity embraces that identity and loves that person, including them in the faith, affirming their identity with no judgment whatsoever. This is predicated on the idea that God is love (1 John 4:8), therefore, genuine Christianity loves a person no matter their identity.
The problem, of course, is this runs entirely in contradiction to the commands of Scripture. Yes, God is indeed love. In fact, God demonstrated His love for us in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). This is the key to understanding God’s love. God loves sinners. And sinners, by definition, sin. And sin is lawlessness (1 John 3:4). In other words, God loves people who, by their nature, rebel against Him and seek to seat themselves on His throne. Sinners deserve God’s wrath for the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). Yet, God in His love sent Christ to die in the place of sinners so that they may be redeemed (John 3:16). Therefore, it is not embracing or accepting sin that is love, but rather the sacrificial death of Christ on the part of sinners that they may be saved and made a new creation that demonstrates His love.
Furthermore, when a person is redeemed in Christ, they are made a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17). They have a new heart with new desires (Ezekiel 36:26). We are freed from the shackles of sin and death, becoming slaves to Christ (Romans 6:20-22). Because of our new heart, we desire to live in such a way that we are willingly obedient to Christ. He has said that if we love Him, we will obey His commandments (John 14:15). And to us who are truly redeemed, His commandments are not burdensome (1 John 5:2-4). We desire to turn away from the works of the flesh (Galatians 5:19-21) and embrace the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-24).
Genuine Christian love is that which calls people to Christ: to repent of the sins which put us at war with Him; to turn to Him in faith, trusting in His completed work; to be born again by the power of the Holy Spirit and be made a new creation; and to become a willing servant of our Lord and Savior, seeking to obey all that He commanded us.
To aid, grow and guide us, God has given us His revealed Word, that we might know His divine will (2 Timothy 3:16-17). We cannot, apart from His revealed Word, rightly know and practice His commandments. Our flesh, though redeemed, is being sanctified. It is not yet glorified and we must war against the very desires of our flesh (Romans 7:14-25). Therefore, it is God’s revealed Word where must spend our days prayerfully seeking to understand His commandments, renewing and washing our minds (Romans 12:1-2). And God has not left us alone in this endeavor. He has equipped brethren in our midst to be teachers and preachers that we might know and understand His Word more fully (Ephesians 4:10-16). In fact, the apostle Paul repeatedly prayed that those to whom he wrote His letters would come to a fuller knowledge of God and His Word (Ephesians 1:15-23). Thus, it is imperative in the life of a believer in Christ to seek to know and understand God’s Word so that our practice in life may come into accord with His commands.
Therefore, genuine love is that which commands Christians to reject the sinful desires of this world and to seek to become obedient to the commands of Christ (Ephesians 4 & 5). What is unloving is the paganistic idea that we can remain in our sinful identities – the very acts which define rebellion against God and invite His judgment – and call ourselves followers of Christ. Such a concept is not only antithetical to Scripture, it is blasphemous to suggest the One who died and rose Himself from the grave to pay for those sins could accept such behavior as loving or holy.
Christians, true biblical love is that which identifies sin as sin, points to the cross of Christ as the only place where those sins can be cleansed and calls those in Christ to live in loving obedience to His commandments. Anything else is simply a sinful and false teaching.
This week, Chris and Rich discuss the recent posts of “Christian feminist” Jory Micah in which she rejects the Scriptures as being her sole source of Christian authority.
Show Links:
We have had some of you approach us and ask how you can support the podcast. After some thought and prayer, we have decided to create a Patreon account. We are announcing to day that anyone who has the desire and whom God has blessed with the means to do so can become a supporter of this blog and podcast by going to the following link:
https://www.patreon.com/voiceofreasonradio
We are grateful for everyone who listens to the show and prays for us. It is the only support we have ever asked for. But as some have asked to bless this program by supporting financially, we have created this account. We will never hound or beg people for support. That we leave to God who provides more than we can ever hope or pray for. But, if this is something you would want to do, then we are beyond grateful for anything you provide.
God bless from Chris and Rich!
Dr. James White and Rich Story conspire to mess with Chris. Chris and Rich discuss the going ons of the past couple of weeks and the blessing of laughter.
Show Link:
This week we Rewind: Chris shares scriptural passages that can give Christians comfort in troublesome times.
Show Links:
This week, Rich and Chris discuss what it means biblically to love one’s neighbor.
Show Links:
Proponents of Critical Race Theory, those who believe racism is systemic to our culture, often argue that the solution to racism is the creation of new laws. That, by giving the power to government to enact legislation that requires people to divest themselves of “white privilege” and to elevate persons of color will bring about the necessary societal change to defeat racism. As many others have pointed out, this is little more than social Marxism. That the “haves” (those with white privilege) must give up their positions to the “have nots” (disenfranchised persons of color) so that society will be equitable. That there cannot be equality without equity.
Unfortunately, there are great many Christians who have fallen prey to this line of thinking. In an effort to demonstrate their care and concerns for perceived victims of racism, many Christians have been lulled into the idea that systemic injustices exist because disparities exist. They unquestioningly believe people’s “lived experiences” and see them as evidence of ongoing racism in our culture. Because they see God as a God of justice, they have bought into the lie that social justice (an unbiblical concept) is actually an outworking of the gospel to bring about true justice into the culture. Thus, many have supported the idea that increased legislation is actually doing gospel work in our nation so that we are “loving our neighbors.”
This, however well-intentioned, is entirely misguided. The establishing of new laws cannot bring about societal change as so many have argued. We know this because we can see from Scripture that God’s own laws, which are righteous and perfect, do not bring about a utopia on this world. In fact, as Paul argues in Romans 7:7-25 that, while God’s law is perfect, man is utterly incapable of keeping it. The law exposes a very real problem in the heart of man, sin. Mankind is born in sin, we have a corrupted nature that rebels at the very mention of the law.
Paul demonstrates this when he writes, “Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet.’ But sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me all kinds of covetousness. For apart from the law, sin lies dead.” (Romans 7:7b–8). Our sinful nature immediately reacts to any law placed upon it with rebellion. You see this when we read a sign that says “Wet paint, don’t touch,” or “Keep off the grass.” Our very first instinct is to do that which we have been told not to do. The law exposes that our hearts are rebel factories, simply looking for a reason to act in contradiction to anything we’ve been told to not do.
Paul rightly points out that the law is not responsible for making us sin. We break the law because our default state is to sin. God’s law is perfect and the fact we even think about wanting to break it proves that the law is good. If our hearts are sinful by nature, then we show that God’s law is good because our hearts do not want to obey it. Therefore, law cannot and does not change our default desires. Law only exposes that we will rebel when given a chance to do so.
Naturally, it is right to understand there is a distinction between the law of man and the law of God. His laws are always right and true. He cannot make law that is not perfect because His laws are a reflection of His glorious nature. Man’s laws can either be good, insomuch as they reflect the nature of God, or they can be bad, in that they contradict His nature and commandments. For example, laws that forbid lying, theft, and murder reflect the nature of a perfect God who does not lie and provides what is needed for His people whom He created in His image and likeness. Yet, laws such as allow for abortion, the wanton murder of a life in the womb of a mother, is incompatible with a God who has commanded we shall not murder. We recognize then that man’s laws are not always right and good. Yet, whether a law is good or bad, man by nature will always desire to rebel against any command placed upon him.
When it comes to the matter of laws regarding social justice, we must come to realize such laws do not have a Scriptural basis. Social justice argues that true equality only occurs when all persons have equity of outcome. It is argued that any disparity between people groups is proof of oppression. The only way to overcome and end the oppression is to tear down the existing unjust system and rebuild a new society based upon equitable distribution of wealth, position, and power. Nowhere in Scripture can anyone find such an argument. In fact, Scripture speaks of private property ownership. It also allows for the possession of wealth, yet not the misuse of it to deprive others of the wages they have earned.
Christ’s teachings with regard to wealth and power were not that the mere possession of it was sinful, but the desire to have it over and above the desire to love and obey God was. Those with power were not to lord it over others, but to use their position to serve. Those with wealth were to be willing to provide for the needs of others, not out of compulsion, but out of a sincere desire to love God and love others. Christ never taught for the tearing down of entire systems of wealth and power, rather that those who had such never place them before the love and service to God. If having such caused one to be idolatrous, then we were to give it all up for the sake of Christ.
Christians ought to recognize that bringing in laws which declare possession of power, wealth, or position are inherently evil have no basis in Scripture. Furthermore, God does not command that we not only believe such persons are oppressors by nature and that the existence of disparities now or throughout history prove racism. God holds each person accountable for the thoughts, words, and deeds of his own heart. He does not hold the son guilty for the sins (real or perceived) of the father. He does not declare that men and women are guilty of oppressing others simply because an unbiblical philosophical claims it to be so. And He gives no biblical command to take from one group and give to others to make right perceived unjust disparities. Yet, proponents of Critical Race Theory are arguing for such laws and far too many Christians are towing that line.
We must recognize that any law placed upon men will immediately result in a desire to rebel against said law. While, perhaps, it may act as a curb against certain behaviors, it cannot change the heart’s desire. Many a neighbor has likely been spared a punch to the face because someone feared arrest for Battery. Yet, the existence of Battery laws does not change the hate a man will feel in his heart toward his neighbor. The law may cause him to obey out of fear of legal action, but it will not keep him from desiring to harm another.
Likewise, we must also understand that unjust laws, such as those that declare a man guilty of a crime he never committed and take from him to give to another, will give rise to bitterness and anger. Being told that you are guilty for the perceived sins of generations past and that only by bowing to the new order of things can you make restitution, will cause many persons to feel they are being treated unjustly. In fact, the new order of things actually tells a man that even feeling angry over being charged with such a “sin” is proof of his guilt. How then can we expect that such laws will bring about a change of heart and mind? Such laws may bring about an outward appearance of equity of outcome, but there will be no heart change of any kind. Yes, there will be a redistribution of wealth and position, but rest assured, those who have been charged as guilty will chafe under unjust chains which they have been placed under. Resentment and bitterness will grow. Love for one’s neighbor will be quashed as the heart, already a factory of sin, will find further reason to hate those who have placed him under perceived bondage.
The human heart rebel’s against good and just laws. Such laws are good for us. They hold us accountable when we disobey God’s righteous commands and harm others. Yet, as Paul argues in Romans 7, those laws only expose that we cannot be made righteous by them. When man creates unjust laws and demands obeisance, men will double in their desire to disobey. Unjust laws cause us to become bitter and angry, which the sinful heart will only magnify. In either matter, it is the issue of the heart that must be addressed. And laws, neither good or bad, can change the human heart.
This is where Christians and the church need to shine. We already know that laws cannot make a man righteous. Only the gospel can accomplish this. Only God can send His Spirit into the heart of man, regenerate him, and make him a new creation. Only Jesus can take the wrath man deserves and, in turn, clothe him in righteousness. Only then does man desire in his heart to love his neighbor as himself. Only then does man desire to obey the just and good laws of God. Only then is he willing to sacrifice of his own time, wealth, position, or power to share and care for others. Law of itself cannot ever accomplish this, only the gospel can. And such a changed heart will distinguish between just and unjust laws. It will greatly desire to obey all that God has commanded. But, often it will rightly recognize and reject those laws that are manmade, which are in contradiction to the Word. This should be encouraged to grow and mature, not silenced and told to obey because social justice demands it.
Churches that seek to create societal change through unjust laws betray the gospel message. They reject the notion that law cannot change the heart. They seek to impose godless ideologies on people and claim this is the outworking of the gospel. Nothing could be further from the truth. What they believe is a good work is actually seeking to add more law over and above the commands of God. They claim this will accomplish change and establish justice in culture, but in fact it will create further rebellion in the hearts of men. And what little cleaning of the outside of the cup they may accomplish, they will only stir up further poison and sin on the inside.
Christians, we must first seek the kingdom of God. We do this through the preaching of the gospel. We identify what is truly sin and call people to repentance and faith. We call people to love Christ and love their neighbor. We command those in the church to live according to the commandments of God and reject godless ideologies which seek to rewrite and corrupt Scripture. We do this, not because we seek societal change, rather we seek to bring rebel sinners into communion with God. We do this to save them from His just wrath and for His glory. Then, we trust in God to work through the Spirit in the hearts of men to love and treat their neighbors as they are commanded to. And, should they fail to do so, should they sin against their brethren, we come alongside and lovingly rebuke or correct them.
The church is not a societal change agent. The church is the bride of Christ. Time for us to get back to being what He has called us to be.
We have to get this right. There is a difference between temptation which we struggle against and identifying ourselves with said temptation as though it is part of our makeup.
If I said I was a “lust-attracted Christian” or a “theft-attracted Christian” we easily see the problem. It makes zero sense to identify ourselves by our temptation to sin. So calling one’s self as a “same-sex attracted Christian” makes it possible for someone to hold onto the lie that we are identified by our sexuality.
A Christian can struggle against sexual temptation & still be a Christian. We all struggle against sin daily. But giving sin identity and merging that with the name of Christian is a slap in the face to what Christ did in and for us.
We are no longer the old man. We are new creations. We are no longer slaves to sin. We are slaves to righteousness. We are identified as followers of Christ, serving a new Lord and Master.
Thus, to wed sinful desires to the name of our new Master is an utter contradiction in terms. It is nothing more than an attempt to appease those of the tolerance crowd who have complained the church has been too mean to homosexuals.
So, the wedding of these mutually exclusive terms is an attempt to soften the blow by saying being a homosexual in identity is OK, but acting on it is not. Folks, this needs to stop.
No, we cannot add offense to the gospel for the sake of being offensive. But, the gospel message is in fact offensive to a sin-hardened world. It tells us to reject the sins of our heart and turn to Christ. He is our Lord, He is our Master, and He is our identity.
Let us forsake the merging of the profane with the holy that we might somehow seem more “loving.” Rather, let us in love call out sin and call people to repentance without equivocation.
This week, we return to last year when Chris and Rich discussed the need for Christians to develop and apply a biblical worldview in their lives.
Show Links:
Focus on the Family – What’s a Christian Worldview?
CARM – What Are Some Christian Worldview Essentials?
© 2024 Slave to the King
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
Recent Comments