Slave to the King

Unworthy rebels, redeemed by the King of Kings and made servants fit for His use.

The Danger of Unjust Anger

You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.” (Mt 5:21–22)

We live at a time when sinful depravity is celebrated as virtue and godliness is treated as vice. Those who seek to uphold all that is right and good according to Scripture are seen as evil, people to be hated and shunned from society. As such, it is all too easy to cultivate a heart of unjust anger and even hatred, toward “those who call evil good and good evil” (Isa. 5:20). This is not to say that Christians cannot feel hurt, frustrated, and dismay over those who seek to persecute the church for preaching the truth about sin and its inevitable consequences. It would be irrational to expect Christians not to have a reasonable emotional response to evil in the world, especially that which is directed at the church. However, our emotions must not lead our thinking. Our biblically informed mind must guide and control our emotional state.

Jesus taught His disciples in the Sermon on the Mount that Christians will face persecution (Mt 5:10-12). It is not a question of if but when we will face the wrath of the world for standing with Christ. We may feel inclined to be angry at those who demand our acquiescence to their sin or their threats of persecution against us. However, Christ teaches His followers an altogether different reaction. When facing the onslaught of a wicked culture, Jesus taught, “Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven” (Mt 5:12). Rather than be consumed by anger and hatred toward their persecutors, the followers of Christ are to count themselves as blessed to be counted among the prophets who came before them, those who paid the ultimate price for trusting in God. Christ commands us to fix our thinking on Him and His promises that we might be joyful even in the midst of the worst kind of affliction.

As Christians, we know that the world is dead in trespasses and sin. This is the default state of every human being outside of Jesus Christ. While God, in His common grace, restrains much of humanity from expressing just how evil it can be, we know that no one is capable of obeying and honoring God apart from being made a new creation in the Holy Spirit. It should not surprise us that the world will not only embrace sin but will demand we join them in their depraved celebration of it. So blinded are they by the passions of their sin, that they will attack and malign Christians who refuse to take part with them (see 1 Peter 4:4). It is when we lose sight of this biblical truth that we begin to succumb to a sense of shock and dismay as we watch the world enraptured with sinful abandon. This is not to say that sin should not grieve us deeply. It must do so for what else drives us to proclaim the gospel to those enslaved to sin? Yet, when we allow our emotions to override our understanding of God’s truth, grief over sin can change to distress, anxiousness, anger, and even hatred. Instead of being driven to compassion to proclaim the truth to sinners, we can be led to treat them as an enemy to be vanquished.

When we allow our emotions to lead our thinking, unjust anger and hatred for sinners can lead us to justify the mistreatment of the very persons who should be our mission field. Rather than preaching the truth in love – warning people of the wrath of God for sin and calling them to repentance and faith in Christ – we may find ourselves mocking, deriding, and cursing sinners. Instead of leading them to the path of salvation, we verbally assault those who stand opposed to God, attempting to drive them from public view. It is not compassion and love that drive us but animosity and anger. Furthermore, we will begin to justify our behavior, claiming that we are acting as the prophets and Jesus did when they stood against the world. Our emotional drift leads us to believe that our personal sense of offense that sinners actually sin can be categorized as righteous indignation rather than self-righteous anger. Once we allow ourselves to believe such behavior is acceptable, we turn a blind eye to Christ’s warning against unjust anger.

Christ’s sermon reveals that God’s law was not only about action but also the thoughts and intents of the heart. Adultery was not just the act of fornication with someone you are not married to but also the lustful thoughts of the heart and mind. Murder, one of the most heinous sins one can commit, was not just the act of taking a life but also the evil emotional state of hatred against that human being. God’s law demands complete perfection in thought, word, and deed. There is no means by which we can justify sins of the mind and heart. Even if never acted upon, the sins of our hearts, which no one may ever see, are enough to condemn us eternally. Therefore, when Christ preaches against unjust anger and verbal mockery, it should be a stark warning to all Christians everywhere. If we are called to live holy lives, that is not limited to how we act, but how we think and speak as well. When the Apostle John warns us that hatred of a brother places one in darkness (1 John 2:11) and even marks that person as a murderer in the eyes of God (3:15). And before we think we have found a loophole, it is no shield to say that sinners are not our brothers. Before we were redeemed in Christ, we were His enemies. Yet, while we were yet these wicked and vile rebels, Christ died for us (Rom. 5:8).

Christians must be wary of their hearts which so easily lead us to believe we can justify anger and hatred because sinners are evil. Indeed, they are, just as once we were. But Christ in his mercy sent compassionate, grace-filled believers to seek us out and proclaim the truth of the gospel to us. Yes, Christians must have a hatred for sin. We must so hate it that we seek to continuously repent of that which caused our Savior to die in our place. We must so inform our minds with God’s word that we recognize sins of unjust anger and hatred in our hearts and turn from them. We need to control the passions of our emotions by leaning heavily into the promises of Christ, knowing that any wickedness we face for His sake will be our blessing in eternity. Then, we must so despise sin in the world that we desperately call sinners around us to turn from it and turn to Christ who is the only hope of salvation.

NOTE: This article was also published on X.com

The Prejudice of Jonah

There is a recent bout of antisemitism within professing Reformed circles and there are some things that should be considered. The argument seems to be that Jewish people are somehow more malevolent and destructive within society and even suggests that Scripture supports this. Furthermore, it is argued that, because Talmudic Judaism holds that Jesus is currently being punished by being boiled in a vat of excrement, they are more wicked than other false religions that consider Christ to be a prophet. Therefore, since Judaism is more malevolent, it is acceptable to hold a certain amount of disdain for Jewish persons and to target them specifically as a kind of enemy of society.

First, it must be considered that Judaism is worse because how it views Christ’s current state is hardly “more wicked” than other false religious views. Yes, their rejection of Jesus as their long-awaited Messiah, as God in flesh sent to redeem men from their sins, is highly sinful. However, their view of His punishment because they think He is a false Messiah is consistent with their false religious beliefs. They are holding to what they believe should happen to one who blasphemes God. It is a wicked view because it rejects Scripture’s prophecies and revelations regarding the Christ but it is still consistent.

By comparison, other religious systems, such as Islam, try to reduce Christ to a mortal prophet to which they give “honor.” While some argue that this is better than Judaism’s view, it is actually equivalently evil, if not worse. It is not honorable to deny Christ’s deity and work of salvation in any fashion. It is a complete rejection of all that God revealed in His word regarding the coming and the work of His Son. His sinlessness, His righteousness, and His obedience to all that God commanded are denied by reducing Him to being merely human. There is also the rejection of the hypostatic union of Christ, being fully God and fully man, without which, there can be no hope of salvation. But, lastly, and perhaps even more wickedly, it is not honorable to turn Christ into the mouthpiece of false deities. It is demonic to take the name of Christ and claim He is nothing but a sock puppet for whatever godless idol one has concocted. To suggest that this means other religions have a “better” view of Christ is simply delusional.

With that aside, it must be considered what has been said about Jews being somehow more wicked than other ethnic people groups. One argument suggests that Scripture supports this by pointing to the Jews’ repeated efforts to oppose Christ when He walked this earth and their continuous persecution the Jews perpetrated on Christians following the birth of the church. This argument suggests that the Jews’ efforts to thwart Christ reveal they, as a people, were unique in their sinful attitudes toward Christ and the church. Therefore, it is not wrong to believe that Jews today carry that same uniquely wicked mindset today. However, this is woefully myopic from a Scriptural standpoint.

First off, Scripture clearly reveals that Israel (aka, the Jews) is the ethnic people group through which God chose to reveal Himself to the world. All that God did with the Jews was to establish the types and shadows that would be fully revealed in Jesus Christ. All His promises and prophecies are given to us through this people. Therefore, Scripture spends a great deal of time with Israel, dealing with both her sins and her obedience, showing us God’s character, requirements, and His ultimate plan to deal with sin. When we see the Jews in rebellion, it is not so that we consider them to be a far more wicked people. Rather, they are an example of sin in the world at large. And, given that they received God’s direct revelation and still rebelled, what hope has the rest of the world which was as deeply stained by sin? Israel’s sinfulness was not something for others to look down upon but a picture of how all people are desperately wicked apart from Christ.

Consider all the Gentile nations and their treatment of God’s people. The Egyptians enslaved the Jews and killed their firstborn male children. The Philistines regularly attacked and took captive Israel (yes, by God’s allowance in response to Israel’s rebellion but they were equally punished for their wicked treatment of the Jews during these campaigns). Babylon, Medo-Persia, and Rome all took captive Israel and treated them wickedly. Are any of these people (or any of their descendants) who assaulted the people of God, and brought in false idols that were imposed on the Jews, more wicked or malevolent? Or is that only to be reserved for a particular people group? It reveals one’s personal bias to suggest that Scripture reserves a special designation of sin for only the Jewish people.

It is necessary to suggest one final consideration for people to think about regarding this debate. There was a particular people group in Scripture that God intended to bring judgment on for their malevolent treatment of His people: the Ninevites. The people of Nineveh hated the people of God and took every opportunity to oppose and persecute them. So wicked were these people that God took specific note to send His judgment upon them. Yet, God would not bring this judgment without warning. He called upon the prophet Jonah to give them a message, that in forty days Nineveh would be overthrown. God, in His mercy to a particularly wicked people, would give them notice of their impending doom. He did not need to do so, for His judgment was justified. Still, God desired to give them a warning.

However, Jonah did not want to go. Why? Because Jonah knew God’s heart. He knew that, should the Ninevites receive a warning and chose to repent, God would stay His wrath. Jonah believed that Nineveh was so malevolent and destructive that they should not receive God’s mercy. Jonah’s hatred was so overwhelming for this ethnic group, that he fled in the opposite direction to avoid the possibility they could be spared. God would not be thwarted, however, and he dragged Jonah back kicking and screaming, in the belly of a great fish, to have His message preached. Jonah’s bias would not justify his disobedience, God made sure of this. And, much to Jonah’s utter dismay, the Ninevites repented and were spared for a time. Jonah judged that his anger toward these people was more justified than God’s willingness to show mercy to a repentant people. God revealed that Jonah’s prejudice did not hold a candle to His perfect plans and purposes.

Those Christians today who believe there is something justifiable about holding antisemitic views simply do not have a leg to stand on. Yes, Jews today are outside the covenant of God because they have rejected Jesus as Christ. This is no different from any other ethnic or religious group that is apart from Jesus. They hold wicked views of Jesus for which they will be held accountable. There are many Jews, just as there are many other non-Jewish people, involved in sinful acts and industries around the world. And, just like the non-Jewish people, they will be held accountable for their sins. Not because they are more inherently sinful as a people, but because they are sinful by nature just as is every other human being who walks the earth. If Christians show bias toward Jews as an ethnic people and treat them as uniquely sinful as compared to all others, we commit the same sin as Jonah. No sinner will escape the judgment of God, yet, He has not called us to be a generation of Jonahs deciding who is or is not worthy of God’s warning of impending wrath. He has called Christians to be His kingdom of priests who preach that judgment is certain apart from repentance and faith in Christ alone.

Therefore, I urge my brethren in the faith, to abandon this foolishness. Stop being hard-hearted Jonahs who take pleasure in seeing others as more wicked than yourself. Rather, admit your self-righteous arrogance, repent of it, and submit to God’s calling to proclaim the gospel to all, regardless of their ethnic background.

NOTE: This article was also published on X.comX.com.

You Must Be Above Reproach

Recently, Tullian Tchividjian, pastor of “The Sanctuary” church in Jupiter, Florida, made a rather shocking post on his X account. He wrote, “10 years ago, I crashed. I cheated on my first wife and lost everything. Some believe such failures permanently disqualify a person from ministry. However, there isn’t a single passage in Scripture that even suggests a universal, lifelong ban for every minister who has fallen.”[1] Many persons responded to Tchividjian, noting that his past sin of adultery had disqualified him from the pastorate according to 1 Timothy 3:1-7. Their replies referred to a 2015 revelation where he had confessed that he had been involved in an extra-marital affair, which resulted in their divorce.

Furthermore, Tchividjian had been removed from the position of senior pastor of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church by the Presbyterian Church in America after this admission. He could only be returned to ministry after displaying an “eminently exemplary, humble and edifying life and testimony,” according to the PCA’s Book of Church Order.[2] Tchividjian was never restored to that position by the PCA. However, he later remarried and, in 2019, began the “The Sanctuary” in Jupiter, Florida.[3] In recent history, he has made news using and defending foul language in the pulpit. He used similar language when he responded to some of his detractors on X following the post noted above. It is because of the very public nature of his sin and failure to address the church disciplinary process that many people argue that Tchividjian is permanently disqualified from the role.

This argument has resulted in quite a public discussion in online Christian circles. While many agree that Tchividjian is disqualified from the pulpit due to his notable sins, others have tried to argue in agreement with him that there can be no permanent barring to the office. Pastor Gabe Hughes of Providence Reformed Baptist Church in Casa Grande, Arizona, stood firm on the argument that a pastor who commits adultery is indeed barred permanently because he is no longer above reproach.[4] And this is truly the crux of the argument. The issue of being above reproach is the matter that many, including Tullian Tchividjian, have failed to consider concerning the qualifications of a pastor.

The office of bishop, overseer, elder, and pastor is of utmost importance in the life of the church. So much so that God gave the church stringent qualifications for the role through the Apostle Paul’s first letter to Timothy. Paul wrote:

The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task. Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God’s church? He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil. [5]

The purpose behind these qualifications was to ensure those who stand before the people to represent God through the preaching of His word are men of good character. It is no trifling matter to lead the flock of Christ in the worship of our Savior. Such a man must be willing to lay aside all personal ambition and become a humble servant of the Lord. It is not his own word he is to preach but the word of God alone. Any man whose character is lacking will be prone to seek his agenda and promote his own self-glorification. Only by being a man whose heart is captive to Christ, thus meeting the qualifications of Scripture, should such a person be considered for the pulpit.

It is important to understand that not only are these qualifications for entering into but also for remaining in the office of pastor. Every man who enters the pastorate must be willing to have his life examined by his fellow elders and members of the church. He is as much accountable to walk in holiness as any other Christian; he is not exempt from confessing and repenting of sin. While no man is sinless, and there is no expectation in Scripture that a pastor must be so, pastors must be willing to receive correction and counsel, even undergoing church discipline if necessary. And, where a pastor openly sins and not only rebuffs correction but refuses any kind of discipline for his sin, he can and should be removed from the office. This is where the very first qualification in Paul’s list is of utmost importance, for any man taking the role of pastor must be above reproach.
The term “reproach” simply means disgrace or insult.[6] Therefore, to be above reproach is to be above the ability to be disgraced or insulted. Yet, this does not give us a complete understanding of what this qualification calls for. John Chrysostom gives us clarity when he writes:

Every virtue is implied in this word; so that if any one be conscious to himself of any sins, he doth not well to desire an office for which his own actions have disqualified him. For such an one ought to be ruled, and not to rule others. For he who bears rule should be brighter than any luminary; his life should be unspotted, so that all should look up to him, and make his life the model of their own.[7]

One who seeks the office of pastor should be a man that others aspire to emulate. If his life and practice disgrace himself and the name of Christ, how can he then inspire others to pursue Christ in righteousness? Likewise, John Calvin writes,

He wishes a bishop to be blameless, instead of which, in the Epistle to Titus, he has used (Tit. 1:7) the word ἀνέγκλητον, meaning by both words, that he must not be marked by any infamy that would lessen his authority. There will be no one found among men that is free from every vice; but it is one thing to be blemished with ordinary vices, which do not hurt the reputation, because they are found in men of the highest excellence, and another thing to have a disgraceful name, or to be stained with any baseness. In order, therefore, that a bishop may not be without authority, he enjoins that there shall be made a selection of one who has a good and honourable reputation, and not chargeable with any remarkable vice. Besides, he does not merely lay down a rule for Timothy what sort of person he must select, but likewise reminds every one of those who aspire to that rank, to institute a careful examination of himself and of his life.[8]

Some sins so hurt the reputation of the pastor, sins which are so debased that the man’s name cannot be disassociated with his actions that his ability to exert any authority over the church is irreparably damaged. When faced with such sins, the man can never be seen as above reproach because his name and reputation are forever tarnished. When that happens, such a man must either be barred from entering the pastorate or be removed (should he be already serving) with no ability to reclaim the mantle. While it is always the desire of the church to bring about repentance and reconciliation with any member of the church, we must honor God’s protection of this role by permanently barring those who have brought reproach upon themselves and the name of Christ.

Tullian Tchividjian and others like him would have the church utterly disregard this most important biblical qualification. Rather than recognizing the pulpit as a sacred duty of a servant committed to the service of Christ, they see it as a personal platform that they deserve to own simply because it is desirable to them. This places their sense of personal fulfillment over and above God’s plan and purpose for the pastorate. They fail to recognize that God has spoken on the issue and limits that position expressly because He calls humble servants who divest themselves of personal gain so that they may make much of Christ. Christians would do well to reexamine the Scriptures on this matter. If we are unwilling to yield our personal feelings so that we feel good about our favorite personalities can take center stage, then we will by no means surrender ourselves to any other matter of holiness that God requires in our lives. As the pastor goes, so does the congregation. Therefore, the pulpit must be protected so that the sheep may learn to be conformed to Christ.

Footnotes:

[1] https://x.com/TullianT/status/1870496030489510043
[2] https://theaquilareport.com/tullian-tchividjian-files-for-divorce/
[3] https://www.news-journalonline.com/story/news/state/2019/09/08/after-sex-scandal-billy-grahams-grandson-to-start-church/3465171007/
[4] https://x.com/Pastor_Gabe/status/1870693594082038258
[5] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version(Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), 1 Ti 3:1–7.
[6] Chamberlain, G., and G. L. Knapp. “Reproach.” Edited by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Revised. Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1979–1988.
[7]John Chrysostom, “Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople, on the First Epistle of St. Paul the Apostle to Timothy,” in Saint Chrysostom: Homilies on Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, ed. Philip Schaff, trans. James Tweed and Philip Schaff, vol. 13, A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1889), 438.
[8]John Calvin and William Pringle, Commentaries on the Epistles to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2010), 76.

This article was also published on X.com.

Be a Man Like Jesus

There has been much debate in our current age about the issue of masculinity. The traditional cultural image is one of a man who bravely shoulders the burden of providing and caring for his family, working hard with his hands, being a warrior who defends the home front, and who does all these things with nary a quiver in his emotional state. In other words, the quintessential man’s man. However, there have been many voices influenced by godless secularism that have decried this image and called it toxic and destructive. Those who do so claim this form of masculinity is responsible for untold damage to women, children, and persons of varying gender ideologies. They have sought to unseat the man’s man ideal and insert a definition of masculinity that far more resembles femininity than anything else. Men and their identities have become the battleground for our cultural future.

The question for the Christian is not how culture defines manhood but what Scripture says. To that end, the best example we should consider is the God-Man Himself, Jesus Christ. We must look to the examples Christ gave us in His life on this earth so that we might emulate Him above all else. In this examination, we need to look at His work in totality, not focusing merely on one character trait over others. This has happened far too often in Christian circles where the intent is to co-opt Christ to forward a particular agenda. Progressives may seek to apply Jesus’s compassion and kindness to claim Jesus would be a feminist, for example. Those hyper-focused on patriarchal ideals may seek to find rugged manliness in Jesus to promote the traditional man’s man image. Yet, in looking at the whole picture of Scripture, we find something far more biblically balanced.

There is little question that Jesus grew up in a world where working hard with His hands would have been the norm. His earthly father, Joseph, was a carpenter (Matt. 13:55). Jesus would have learned the trade and worked with him over the years. Likely, Jesus was even working in this trade before entering His itinerant ministry at thirty years old. Carpentry was not easy work; it would have been rugged work done with His hands. Jesus labored hard as a man, living out the very commandment Adam was given in the garden when God told him to work and keep it (Gen 2:15). Man was made to work, and in doing so, he gives glory to God. Those years of hard work and their impact on Jesus’ earthly body are demonstrated in John 2:14-17 when He made a cord of whips and chased the money changers out of the temple. This was no trifling task, as he would have needed the skill to make the whip and the strength to overturn tables and drive the thieves out of the temple area. Not only did this act reveal His physical strength but His spiritual and mental commitment to His Father. Jesus demonstrated truly righteous indignation, justifiable anger, at those who would make a mockery of the very place where men were to draw close to God.

Jesus further showed godly use of anger when faced with the religious leaders who sought to accuse Him when He was healing on the Sabbath (Mark 3:1-5). These leaders cared very little for the flocks they were to be leading, caring only to be exalted for their traditions, which they added to the law. Christ came to seek and save that which was lost, demonstrating His power over sickness and death by His repeated miraculous healings. He looked at these hard-hearted leaders with righteous anger as he healed the very man they would have denied just to preserve their positions and traditions. Jesus had repeated conflicts with the scribes and Pharisees throughout His walk on this earth, in each case showing courage and boldness unseen in His day. Though the Pharisees repeatedly tried to entangle Him in words and threatened those who would follow Him, Christ would not be deterred; He would not back down. So much so that in Matthew 23, Jesus pronounces several woes on them, judgments they would face for their hypocrisy and self-righteousness. Jesus showed no fear before them, demonstrating uncommon courage for all to see.

With such examples, is it not clear that Christian men should be strong, hard-working, courageous heroes who are angry at those who would defy God? Yes, these are ideal traits that all men should strive for, but they are not the only ones. Jesus also showed characteristics that are all too easily overlooked in this debate. Firstly, Jesus showed kindness that many would see as weakness. In Matthew 8:2, we see such a display. A leper, one who was an outcast in society, who could not be near others, much less touched, lest he communicate his disease to others, comes before Jesus. While this man asks for healing, Jesus takes the matter one step further. While He could have healed the man merely by a word, Jesus touched the man. This man, who had not been touched by another human being for an untold amount of time, received the touch of Christ. Such beautiful kindness was not required, yet our Savior extended it out of love.

In another act of gracious healing, Jesus, on His way to heal Jairus’s daughter, is pressed on every side by a crowd (Luke 8:40-48). Being bumped and jostled by every person in His path, Jesus stops and asks who touched Him. It is not for lack of knowledge, for He knew, but to draw out the one who so desired healing. A woman who had “an issue of blood” for twelve years steps out from the crowd. She was terrified for, in faith, she had touched the hem of Christ’s garment, knowing He could heal her when all others had failed. Yet, like the leper, she could have faced dire consequences, for under the law, anyone who touched her was made unclean. Christ does not pronounce judgment on her but, with compassion and love, tells her, “Your faith has made you well; go in peace” (v. 48) This kind of love and grace is not called for in the man’s man ideology, yet Jesus stops an entire crowd and halts His journey to save a little girl just to ease the physical and emotional burden of a woman who had endured so much.

This kind of lovingkindness was repeatedly displayed by Christ during His ministry. Yet, we see two other acts when He suffered on the cross that help us cement our understanding of His fully orbed masculinity. After enduring an illegal trial, the mockery of the crowds, and the scourging of Pilate, Jesus is hammered to the cross, left to die for crimes He had not committed. While hanging there and suffering, He is ridiculed and mocked by those around Him, including two thieves. At some point during this excruciating experience, one thief comes to realize who Jesus truly is and repents (Luke 23:39-43). He rebukes his fellow thief, acknowledging their crimes have earned them a just punishment, yet Christ has done nothing to deserve His. He then asks Jesus to remember him when He enters into His kingdom. Jesus, who had endured the vile mockery from the man only a short time before, who could have called down righteous judgment for this man’s sins, says, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise” (v. 43). Where most would argue that men should stand firm and hold others wickedness into account, Jesus shows mercy on the most undeserving. And, as one of His last acts, before He yielded up His spirit, Jesus showed compassion on the earthly mother who birthed and cared for Him all His life. After hours of suffering at the hands of evil men, Jesus looks to His mother and the Apostle John, calling for the Apostle to care for her as his own mother (John 19:26-27). Jesus showed in His death that He would care for those most dear to Him and that His mother would never be without someone to watch over her. So, we, as men in Christ, should likewise love those under our care, regardless of whatever it may cost us.

Genuine Christian manliness is not merely about toughness, boldness, and speaking without fear; it is also about gentleness, kindness, and mercy. In Christ, the perfect picture of the godly Man, we have the perfect example of genuine masculinity. No trait outshines the other, all are in perfect balance and used accordingly. Christian men should certainly stand against secular godlessness, which seeks to emasculate men, rendering them into genderless drones. However, this cannot be done by neglecting the fully orbed masculinity given to us by Christ in the Scriptures. We dare not fail to balance our boldness with our patience. We must temper our righteous indignation with our love for the lost. And while we seek to war against all that is ungodly, we must never fail to show kindness to those around us so that they may see Christ in us.

 

This article has also been published on X.com.

Whips, White Washed Tombs, and a Woman at the Well

It is without question that we live in a depraved and perverse culture. Sexual immorality, infant murder in the womb, and gender confusion are just some of the sins that are celebrated as virtues throughout the nation. The Christian church must respond rightly to this growing acceptance and celebration of rebellion against God. The question, however, is how we do so. At a time when the nation is deeply divided along sociopolitical lines, publicly displaying anger and animosity toward one’s ideological opponents has become the norm. In some respects, this is understandable. As a culture, we are being told that anyone who disagrees with our position hates and despises us. To attempt to argue an opposing view means a person wishes to dominate and oppress you. Therefore, the only “reasonable” response is to shout down the opposition and prevent them from having any kind of public voice. In reality, this is nothing more than an attempt to maintain a stranglehold on the culture through verbal violence.

Unfortunately, this ideology has invaded the church as well. Being swept up in the socio-politically driven culture wars, Christians see how secularists have targeted the church as a great “evil” that must eradicated for their agendas to move forward. This is not debatable, as the sociopolitical left has deemed Christian thought and practice as “hate speech” that must be removed from the public square. In response, the desire to respond in kind has been a temptation some have been unable to resist. Many Christians find themselves engaged in a tit-for-tat dialogue where they not only call out the depravity of their opposition but mock and deride them, sometimes quite maliciously. While the concept of fighting fire with fire seems to make pragmatic sense, one must question if it is biblical. In fact, many other Christians have called out this practice, calling on their brethren to tame their tongues and to remember our calling to proclaim the gospel. This has resulted in a debate between professing believers as to how far is too far when responding to a God-hating culture.

Those who engage in coarse protestations often point to the fact that Scripture describes times when even Christ Himself used hard language in dealing with unbelievers. Most famously, they will address the time when He used a whip of cords to drive out the money changers (John 2:14-17) or when He called the Pharisees “white-washed tombs” (Matt. 23:27-28). While Christ indeed could demonstrate hard speech and actions when dealing with His detractors, it is necessary to examine the context in which those events occurred. If we are going to argue we can emulate Christ in like manner, we must ensure that we are applying this behavior rightly instead of using the passages as proof texts to justify what may be sinful behavior.

In John 2, Christ had come to Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover. The city would have been packed with faithful Jews coming to make sacrifices at the temples as commanded in the law. It was a time for the Jews to draw close to God and worship Him for his gracious kindness in covering their sins. However, rather than the temple being a place where they could come and worship freely, it had become a place of thievery. Through a complex web of web animal inspectors and money changers, the Jews were being extorted to pay more for temple-approved lambs to be brought for their sacrifices. When Christ laid eyes on this vile practice, which placed an undue burden on God’s people, His response was to drive out these thieves at the end of a whip. Understand that this was not a response to sinners in general. In reality, sinners surrounded the temple. It was the whole reason they were there. Christ’s actions were directed at a specific people who were making merchandise of His free offer of salvation. They were barring the way of salvation by misleading the people into believing it had to be purchased at a high monetary cost. Christ’s righteous indignation was directed at those who were leading His people astray.

Similarly, in Matthew 23, Christ is proclaiming his famous woes to the scribes and Pharisees. At the beginning of the chapter, Christ is preaching to the people and describing the hypocrisy of these religious leaders. He speaks of how they lay heavy burdens on the people to prove their worth before God, yet they “are not willing to move them with their finger” (v. 4). These are the men who want all the accolades and to be seen as the model of godliness. They expect the masses to do all they command but refuse to hold themselves to the same standard. It is here, in verses 27 and 28, where Christ describes them as “white-washed tombs” that are “full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness.” The scribes and Pharisees were supposed to be the ones who brought God’s word to the people and the people before God.  They were to be so familiar with God’s word that they would rightly lead the people in worship before a gracious God, the One who would cover their sins. Instead, they selfishly made a spectacle of themselves, desiring the worship and applause that rightly belonged to God. They made themselves appear upright and clean before the people, but God saw the wicked hypocrisy of their hearts. It is for this reason that Christ showed no patience with them and declared His woes upon them. His sharp speech was directed at the very leaders who made a mockery of God’s commandments.

Now, let us contrast this with Christ’s interaction with a deeply sinful woman from Samaria. In John 4, Jesus and His disciples are en route to Galilee when they stop in Samaria. The disciples leave Christ at a well to obtain food. It is here where Christ meets a woman who has lived a life of ongoing sexual immorality. Christ does not mock her, He does not distance Himself from her, and He does not call on others to shame her. Rather, Christ engages in a conversation in which He reveals not only His knowledge of her sin but also her desperate need for the spiritual water of forgiveness that can only be found in Himself, the long-awaited Messiah. This woman’s sin was clearly known by the people of Samaria, hence her coming alone to the well in the middle of the day. Her deeds were not secret. By all biblical standards, she was a harlot. Christ had every right as God in flesh to not only condemn her but to openly shame her. Instead, He engages her with love and compassion, bringing her the message of the gospel. The very kind of person Christians find themselves surrounded by today was the mission field Christ Himself sought out intentionally to which to minister.

If Christians desire to engage this wicked culture and seek to emulate Christ in their speech, then we are required to understand just how and why He used the manner of speech He did. Hard speech was indeed used on occasion by our Lord; however, it was most often reserved for those who were expected to rightly lead the people in humble worship yet used their position for their own gain. Christ openly shamed those leaders who were leading the people astray and could not care one whit how much damage they wrought. Yet, when seeing the sinners in the streets, Christ showed compassion on them as sheep in need of a shepherd. He did not water down the message, nor did He waffle on the matter of sin. He warned sternly that fiery judgment awaited all who lived in rebellion, but He called them all to the only means of salvation, Himself. He later commanded His disciples to go into all the world and make disciples of every nation with this very compassionate message.

Christians must find that balance of knowing when and how to speak to the world around us. We cannot use the fact that Christ spoke harshly at times to justify our abuse of those who need the gospel message. We cannot allow our sense of self-righteous indignation to be a shield that allows us to misuse God’s Word so we may gain our pound of flesh at those whose depravity offends us. Yes, there may be times when hard speech is necessary to expose those who would lead sinners into the fires of Hell. Still, we must remember that our mission is to go into the world and make disciples. We can be firm and passionate, exposing sin in the lives of our hearers, just as Christ exposed the Samarian woman had five husbands and was living with a man not her husband. But, we must also love as Christ loved to show those sins can be forgiven through His righteous sacrifice. Our love for Christ and His act of propitiation should drive us to care for those in need of the gospel. It should mold our thoughts and our speech toward them. Even when we must be firm and unwavering, like our Savior, it must always be to point them to the One who can bring them peace. Let this be our guide rather than seeking to cherry-pick the portions of Scripture to justify our anger at those whose sins were once our own.

 

This article was also published at X.com.

Of Blind Guides, Ditches, and Imbalanced Theology

The Christian walk requires us to be ever-thoughtful about remaining on the narrow path. The slightest deviation from God’s prescribed direction for our lives can result in falling into ditches we should have clearly seen had we been paying attention. Proverbs 4:25–27 tells us,

“Let your eyes look directly forward, and your gaze be straight before you. Ponder the path of your feet; then all your ways will be sure. Do not swerve to the right or to the left; turn your foot away from evil.”

Solomon gives his son this warning to heed his sayings, the guidance that would keep him on the narrow path and free from evil. The Christian has all he needs to keep him on that path in the Scriptures, as Paul writes to Timothy saying,

“All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim. 3:16–17)

To avoid the deep ditches that face us on our walk, we must be diligent students of the Word. We cannot approach this flippantly, looking for passages that we affirm our predispositions either. We need to have a fully orbed understanding of God’s commandments so that we might not misapply them and find ourselves deviating from His design for our lives.

In recent years, one such deviation that led into a deep chasm was the inclusion of Critical Race Theory (CRT) into evangelical churches. Attempting to co-opt Scripture’s teachings on justice, CRT adherents preached a gospel of grievance into the church. They demanded Christians recognize what they called “systemic oppression” of certain ethnic groups, which required a dismantling of “power structures” within the church and society. All of this was taught under the guise that God desired justice in His world and that it could only be accomplished by elevating those oppressed ethnic groups while tearing down others. It was a grievous misuse of Scripture, which purposely ignored the Bible’s use of justice (primarily applied to God’s judgment of sinners for their own wickedness) and redefined it with Marxist ideals of monetary and power redistributions in mind. In refusing to read and apply Scripture accurately, CRT proponents led themselves and their followers into a ditch. There was no gospel, no forgiveness of sins, and no joy in the grace of God. Only a perpetual treadmill of victimhood and guilt from which no person could ever be freed.

One might find such a misuse of Scripture easy to identify because the socio-political agenda behind it all runs counter to our own ideals. We can recognize how oppression, which God hates, has been altered to fit the presupposition that ethnicity is the defining characteristic of who is the oppressed and the oppressor. When one party wholly subscribes to an ideology that is so characteristically different from our own, pointing out their sin of changing God’s Word to fit their agenda feels like child’s play. But what about when the ideologies are more akin to our own? Are we so quick to see the ditch for what it is? Or will we fall in line, ignoring the dangers ahead? Unfortunately, some persons within the Reformed camp of Christian theology have not only ignored the warning signs but have led a host of their followers into a ditch of their own making.

The gospel of grievance is not solely owned by the Marxist-driven CRT movement. Today, ostensibly Reformed pastors and social media influencers are preaching a message that white, male, patriarchal Christians are an oppressed group that must rise up and seize the reins of power in our current culture. Unquestionably, they have recognized that our culture is awash in moral depravity. The proliferation of sexual immorality, infant murder in the womb, child mutilation in conjunction with gender confusion hysteria, and more is a real and present danger. Furthermore, the powers that be have made it their goal to isolate certain ethnicities, genders, and ideologies as the scapegoat for all the world’s ills. If there is an “antichrist” in secularism, it is the white, male, conservative Christian. Secularists have made it their stated goal to denigrate and isolate them from any influence in culture. The question is not if these things be true but how then we should deal with the issue at hand.

Traditionally, the church has taught that the answer to a world drowning in sin is the proclamation of the gospel and discipleship of believers. Christians have recognized that, apart from the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit in regeneration, sinners cannot hope to please God. While we desire and work toward societies that do not flaunt or celebrate sin, we know that hearts must be changed for nations to desire to obey God. And changed hearts can only come through the preaching of the gospel. It is a time-intensive, generational work that has impacted societies around the globe. Many cultural transformations occurred because faithful Christians preached the gospel to the lost and taught them to live in accordance with Scripture. However, as time passes, subsequent generations either are not discipled as they ought to be or reject the teachings of their progenitors, following their sinful hearts to do what is right in their own eyes. Today, we find ourselves at such a point, replaying in our day Scripture’s revelation of how Israel time and again fell into sin and depravity.

Within Reformed Christian circles, there is a desire to achieve the end state of years of discipleship by instituting a Christian government by force. Rather than urging Christians and churches to be engaged in massive evangelistic efforts, they are calling for an immediate overturn of the current national governing system and implementation of Christian laws to be enforced by the church. They preach the grievances of how white Christian men have been maligned and emasculated by our culture and call for Christians to engage in sociopolitical activism to create a new form of nationalism. This may seem to be encouraging until examination of their professed ideology is compared with Scripture as a whole. When viewed in this light, it becomes apparent that there is an imbalance in their theological applications, something that must be righted lest well-meaning brethren continue to be led astray.

Some of the concerning issues revolve around issues of ethnic relations and gender roles. As noted above, there is no question that secular Marxist ideologues target white males today. In response, there have been calls by some professing Christians for white persons to find unity solely within their own ethnicity, claiming that nationalism requires ethnic solidarity as part of its foundation. Some have rebuffed any notion that, as Christians, we are to have closer ties to fellow Christians who have different ethnic backgrounds than unbelievers of the same skin color. While Scripture does recognize that distinct ethnicities are part of the makeup of the church (Rev. 7:9), those distinctions are ultimately irrelevant as part of our identity (Gal. 3:28–29). To call on Christians to establish a nation that focuses on ethnicity as part of our identity is to ignore the totality of Scripture.

When it comes to the roles of men and women, especially in the home, some professing Christians are strict adherents to a patriarchal system. It is clear from passages such as Ephesians 5:22–33 that wives and husbands have unique roles involving submission and authority. However, patriarchy, while biblical, is being stretched to bordering on oppression in the Christian home under their teachings. It is not uncommon for some persons to claim women should always be silent, never questioning their husbands, submitting to every whim (as long as it is not sinful by their definition), and elevate the husband’s authority as ultimate in the home. This is contradictory to passages such as Colossians 3:19, which says to not be harsh with one’s wife, and 1 Peter 3:7, which calls on husbands to live in an understanding way with their wives. Even Ephesians 5:25 describes having a self-sacrificing love for one’s wife. The attitude that any perceived dissension between a wife and husband is a direct result of feminism is nothing more than giving cover fire for blatant misuse of Scripture.

These are only a couple of examples of concerning, imbalanced beliefs within this nationalist framework. Yet, these alone should give every Christian cause for concern. While not every professing Christian who adheres to nationalist ideals is a false teacher driving professing believers astray, it is becoming clear that those enamored with this view are adopting similar strategies to the CRT-driven lunacy. And, in both cases, whether they be deliberately misleading or unintentionally misguided, they are falling off the path into deep, cavernous ditches. It is incumbent upon the Christian church to identify these nationalist teachings as a misuse and misapplication of Scripture. We must desire to do all that we can to teach Scripture in its full context and keep sound biblical truth from being distorted to advance agendas, regardless of any good intention, that will lead Christians off the narrow path. This has and will continue to offend the most vocal of its teachers and adherents. To that, all we can do is echo the words of Christ,

“Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit” (Matt. 15:14).

 

This article was also published on X.com.

It Shall Not Be So Among You

But Jesus called them to him and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mt 20:25–28)
As I watch a certain movement within Reformed Christian circles continue to demand attention, I cannot help but see a stark difference between their behavior and Christ’s command to His disciples. Today, there are those calling for the establishment of a distinctly Christian nation. This would be a nation whose laws and governmental systems would require its citizens to appear to live as if they were Christians, even if they are outside the covenant. It is a top-down structure where Christian ideals and principles are to be enforced as the law of the land. And those who disobey the law would be punished by the Christian government.
Such a nation may seem to be an ideal but the question remains how we would attain such a Christian utopia. The Christian church has taught throughout history that we are to proclaim the gospel of Christ, seeking to convert sinners to Christ. Such converts are then taught to obey the Scriptures in all manner of their lives, including how they interact with the civil government. As the church grows and the people are changed through the Spirit and the Word, the byproduct can be a nation transformed for Christ. Laws and governments begin to reflect this change as the people become increasingly involved. While this is not guaranteed in every corner of the world, Western culture for many generations proved this to be a likelihood. The church grew and the governments changed because humble Christians shared the faith and lived out what they preached.
But, as the culture has fallen into depravity and great evils have been given government endorsement, many Christians feel that the gospel alone is not the antidote. They call for greater activism and demand the church go forth and conquer the civil realm, not through the preached word, but by the takeover of governmental institutions. They see brash militancy as the solution where humble servitude has failed. The reclamation of the culture through enforcing Christian laws, by their definition, is seen as the only viable option. The establishment of a kind of Christian monarchy where society is ruled by fiat is the only consideration given. Those espousing this system seem to believe the time for humble service has passed, it is time for the church to rule the nations with a rod of iron.
Yet, Christ, the King of all creation taught something quite different. When James and John sought to sit at His right and left – positions of authority, places of ruling and reigning – Jesus gave the disciples God’s position on Christian leadership. He showed them how the rulers of the nations lorded their power and authority over the people, something one would expect from the government. But Christ then said, “It shall not be so among you” (Mt. 20:26). Instead, He taught them that the greatest among them would be the one who sought to be a servant, a slave. They were not to seek power that they would be mighty rulers over all. They were to see themselves as humble servants. They were to be the least among all that they might be servants of all. Just as Christ gave Himself as a ransom for His people, the disciples were to consider themselves to be the chief slaves so that the people might be won to the Savior.
This does not mean that no follower of Christ can ever be in a place of authority. We are not relegated to being those who only ever work in the lowest places of the workforce. Nor are we prohibited from working in civil government or places of leadership. Rather, in all our vocations and places within society we are to have an attitude of humility, seeing our work as a means of service to others, using even our humble work as a tool in leading the lost to Christ. We do not seek authority and power that we might lord it over others and compel them to follow Christ by force. Rather, we preach the truth wherever we may be and then serve those both above and below us so that they see the truth of the gospel worked out before them.
Those who seek the authoritarian, top-down approach reveal the lack of humility in their hearts through arrogance, crassness, and perpetual anger directed, not just at the depraved culture, but also at their Christian brethren who raise concerns with their ideology. Whenever a brother or sister reminds them that our call is to proclaim the gospel, that person is often met with derision and mockery. An attitude of superiority and haughtiness permeates many of their interactions with others. It is not uncommon to see the uses of slurs and crass language leveled at those whom they believe to be the cause of society’s downfall. Much like James and John in Luke 9:54-55, they seek to figuratively call down fire on their adversaries. All of this is contrary to the image of the servant leader Christ called His disciples to emulate.
It is right and good for Christians to desire to see their cultures and nations conformed to the Word of God. Any person calling themselves a Christian who does not desire to see the lost come to Christ should question if they are truly in the faith. But, such desire must be tempered by our conformity to Christ. We cannot act like the world, gnashing our teeth in anger at the very sinners with whom we once walked arm in arm before Christ graciously redeemed us. Jesus’s teaching is clear, all leaders and rulers who call themselves Christians are not to be conquering warriors, ruling over societies by force. Rather, we are to be the servants of all, humbling recognizing that it is God who is the one true King over all creation. We are merely His servants to be used according to His gracious plan to bring the lost to salvation. And, if He graces us to live in a nation where Scripture is the authority over all the people, it will be because we have heeded the call to go forth and make disciples in all the land. Let us reject the lustful power of worldly kings, let us embrace the role of humble servitude by which God has turned nations on their heads.
Article also published on X.comX.com.

Fix Your Eyes on Christ

The Christian finds himself in a unique place, a citizen of Heaven, yet living in this world. In this place of dual residency, he must live out his days on this side of the veil with eternity in view. The Christian must conform his thoughts, words, and deeds to Christ above all; yet, living in this world includes the temptation to act as the world does. This is why the apostle Paul, in writing to the church in Colossae urges his brethren to “seek the things that are above, where Christ is” (3:1). He calls the Colossians (and all Christians everywhere) to fix their eyes on Christ and to be conformed to Him alone in all things. It is in this command that the Christian finds the antidote against being led by the world in how we should live.

In 1:15-20, Paul writes one of the most powerful passages explaining the deity of Christ, in which he states, “For in him all the fullness of God was please to dwell…” (1:19). This passage is the lynchpin of the letter, the very reason why the Christian is called to be conformed to Christ and not the world. It is Christ who created all things (1:16), He is the One who existed before the foundations of creation were laid (1:17), He is the head of the church itself (1:18), and He is the One through whom sinners are reconciled to Himself (1:20). There is no Christianity, no church, and no forgiveness for sin if not for Christ. The Christian owes his very existence and his salvation to the perfect God-Man. As such, the Christian must recognize and humbly submit to Christ as the sole authority in his life. His whole life is one of seeking to conform himself to the Savior who purchased him by His shed blood. It is a loving and willing submission, a desire to serve Christ because He is so precious to the Christian. Paul is calling the church to see Christ for who He is, the God to whom we owe everything.

It is with this in mind, that Paul writes to the church, “as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him…” (2:6). Paul is calling the church to live in such a way as to be fully conformed to Christ. This means that Christians must live out their time in this world by corresponding their thoughts, words, and deeds with how Christ is revealed to us in His word. It also means rejecting the ideologies and behaviors of this world. This is why Paul writes “Put to death what is earthly in you…” (3:5) and further states “…whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus…” (3:17). It is a complete rejection of the deeds of the flesh and the temptations of the world. We are to recognize that all the world has to offer leads us further into sin, taking us away from God and His loving plan for us. We are to, instead, seek Christ and live in accord with all He has commanded us so that we might be an example of His grace and mercy to the world. Not only are we to flee from sinful temptations, but we are to reject worldly ideologies that seem to be useful but accomplish nothing in drawing us closer to Christ.

Paul warns the church against “philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world…” (2:8). This warning is crucial because such philosophies have “…an appearance of wisdom…” but “…are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh” (2:23). In other words, there is a risk of falling prey to worthless ideologies that appear to have some value in a Christian’s life but instead is detrimental to his spiritual growth. It is necessary for the Christian to be so steeped in the word of God that he can discern the difference between that which is Christlike and that which is of the world. This is because the clear teachings of Scripture “living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and spirit, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Heb. 4:12). The Scriptures open our eyes to what is godly and expose what is worldly. They inform the heart and mind, transforming hearts, so that, as Paul wrote to the Colossians, Christians would be “filled with the knowledge of his will…so as to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord…” (1:9). It is through the knowledge of the word of God, illuminated by the power of the Holy Spirit, that the Christian can recognize that the ideologies of the world are worthless and empty.

There is a real danger for the Christian to be caught up in the thinking and attitudes of the world. It is far too tempting to see the outward appearance of positive change and progress (as the world defines it) and think that there is merit in what the world is doing. The problem is that we cannot allow the outward appearances of the world to become the dividing line by which we determine if ideologies and behaviors are beneficial to the Christian walk. Whether the source of these ideas and actions is religious, secular, political, or some combination thereof, the Christian must be desirous of examining them under the harsh light of Scripture. If they do not line up with God’s word, if they run afoul of the precepts and commands of Christ, then they are to be rejected. It matters not if they appear to gain some outward accomplishments, they are divorced from Christ.

The church must seek to hold fast to Christ, “from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows from a growth that is from God” (2:19). Genuine growth is that which conforms the life of a Christian to Christ regardless of what is happening in the world around him. Such growth finds its joy and peace in being more like the Savior over and above achieving something “great” as defined by the world. The life of the Christian, the determination of “success” in the church, is not found in what the world finds valuable. It is determined solely on the commitment to fix one’s eyes on Christ, to “seek the things that are above” in each and every circumstance, and to trust that God’s plans and purposes are of eternal and infinite value. Only here will the Christian find the strength to live in a world that is at war with Christ while yet looking forward to our eternal rest waiting for us in the age to come.

This article is also published on X.comX.com.

We Are No Better

In the last two months, former President Trump, the current Republican presidential candidate in the 2024 election, has had two attempts on his life. The first occurred on July 13, 2024, at a rally in Pennsylvania, where a young man fired shots at Trump from the roof of a building, wounding him in the ear while also taking the life of a spectator. Secret Service agents took the shooter’s life in response. The second attempt was at a golf course on September 15, 2024, where a man was found hiding in bushes along a fence line with a rifle pointed through the fence. The Secret Service agents, who were sweeping the area ahead of Trump, fired upon the would-be gunman when they spotted his rifle barrel. The man fled the area and was later apprehended.

These attempts are historic during an election period. The last effort of this nature occurred on March 30, 1981, when John Hinckley, Jr. attempted to shoot then-President Ronald Reagan. To have two separate attempts on the life of a former President currently running for office is unheard of in modern American history. Much can be said about the circumstances surrounding these attempts. The political rhetoric on all sides during one of the most contentious election periods in current times certainly brings into question how much influence the media, politicians, activists, and commentators have in inspiring such attacks. Questions are rightly raised as to the motivations of the shooters themselves.  Of further importance is the failure at the organizational level of the Secret Service to provide proper security for a politician who has ongoing and active threats to his life. Yet, a matter that should be discussed is that, but for God’s restraining grace, every single person is capable of the evil these men have perpetrated.

That is an uncomfortable and offensive statement to make to the average person. Most of us would be aghast at the thought of being compared to wicked and violent men who callously attempt to take the life of another. We believe there is no possible way we could be that evil. It is easy for us to think this way when we seek to compare ourselves to the most open and flagrant evil acts. Yet, when we compare ourselves to the pure goodness of God, when we examine ourselves in the light of His holy law, the sinfulness of our hearts becomes more apparent. After all, it was Christ Himself who said that to look with lust was to commit adultery of the heart (Matt. 5:28), and to harbor unjust hatred or to use harsh language of someone was equivalent to murder of the heart (Matt. 5:21-22). Wickedness cannot be determined by merely comparing what we do outwardly with other people. It is unveiled when we examine even the thoughts and intents of our hearts against a holy God.

The apostle Paul makes it clear in his letter to the Ephesians that we all are cut from the same cloth. Every single human being that has walked this earth has fallen into the same condition, none of us have escaped. In writing to the church in Ephesus, he tells the Christians, “And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience…” (2:1-2). Paul reveals that every person has the same problem: we are dead in our sins. We are born sinners into this world; it is our default state. As such, we think, speak, and act with the taint of sin in everything we do. There is nothing free from the stain of sin about us. We are, at heart, as wicked and vile as the rest of humanity. We may delude ourselves because our sins committed in the open are “not as bad” as someone else’s, but such a comparison only reveals that we are willfully ignorant as to how rebellious our hearts are.

Yet, we cannot deny that the sins committed by some are far more flagrant and viler than others. To what can we attribute such a vast difference? One answer can be found in the opening chapter of the book of Romans. In speaking of those who have rejected God and pursued their desires and idols, Paul writes, “Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen” (Rom. 1:24-25). This reveals something about the gracious nature of God, even with those who rebel against Him; He, by his gracious kindness, restrains the wickedness of mankind. Therefore, while some sinners are allowed to pursue their evil to the most devious ends, many men, women, and children are kept by God’s hands from pursuing their sin to the uttermost. There does come a time, as people express their hatred of God in greater ways, that He will remove His hand of restraint and give people over to their depravity. Woe to those cultures and nations that fall under such judgment from a holy God. Their eventual end and His great wrath will not be stayed. Therefore, it can only be concluded that the only difference between the man who occasionally lies on his timecard about how much time he worked and the man who is a serial murderer is the gracious hand of God who keeps the former from becoming the latter openly.

This is exactly the point Paul makes to the Ephesians when he writes, “among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind” (2:3). We live, think, and speak just like the rest of the sinful world. We are no better than the worst criminal or terrorist we have seen on the evening news. In the eyes of God, we are the same at heart. With that in mind, if there is no difference between any of us, what possible hope can we have? Paul gives us the answer, “But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ…” (2:4-5). The only solution, the only way we can be saved from the wickedness of our hearts, is to turn to Jesus Christ, who redeems the sinner and makes him a new creation. It is when we repent and trust in Christ alone that the sinner is no longer a rebel against God. We are changed, we are freed from our sinful nature and clothed in the righteous robes of Christ. We are given new hearts and a new nature, one formed by the hands of God that desires to love and obey our Savior rather than to be at war with Him. This is what brings us hope, that which brings freedom and joy to a heart once enslaved to sin.

Therefore, when we turn on the evening news and see another great tragedy, when we see the depravity of man on display, we ought to be forced to examine our hearts and see the true nature of ourselves on display. For the sinner, it should cause him to tremble, to see himself as God sees Him, a wicked rebel deserving of His just wrath. For the Christian, it should bring great joy, not because we are better than those who commit great acts of evil, but because we are simply better off. We were once as vile as those persons once were, but God, in his grace and mercy, purchased us and made us new. Now, we can live as people free from the stain of sin. This becomes the driving force behind us to live as God has called us to, for as Paul wrote, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (2:10). Let this also be our motivation to call guilty sinners to repentance, to call them out of darkness into the light of Jesus Christ that they too may be freed from bondage and given the new heart that God once did for us. Let us remember that we are no better than the rest of the wicked world. And let us be moved with compassion to be His servants to be used in saving the lost.

This article is also published on X.com.

Is This the End? – YouTube Edition

Welcome to a special VOR episode. We want to let you all know why we have been absent, what is happening in our lives, and what this all means for the future of the podcast. Thank you all for your support, we could not have made it this far without you.

« Older posts

© 2025 Slave to the King

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑